Free Da 2166 9 1 Template

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is crucial to avoid common mistakes that could lead to delays or complications. Here are four frequent errors to watch out for:

1. Incomplete Administrative Data:

   Many individuals forget to fill out all the required fields in Part I. This includes essential information such as the rated NCO's name, SSN, rank, and unit. Omitting even one detail can result in processing delays.

2. Incorrect Dates:

   It is vital to ensure that all dates are entered correctly, especially in sections like counseling dates and the period covered. Mistakes in these areas can lead to confusion regarding the evaluation timeline.

3. Missing Signatures:

   Signatures from the rater, senior rater, and supplementary reviewer are essential for validation. If any of these signatures are missing, the form may be considered incomplete and could be returned for correction.

4. Failure to Review Comments:

   After completing the evaluation, it is important to review all comments thoroughly. Comments should accurately reflect the rated NCO's performance. Neglecting this step can result in misunderstandings or misrepresentations of the individual’s capabilities.

By being mindful of these common mistakes, individuals can help ensure that the DA 2166-9-1 form is completed accurately and efficiently.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is an essential document used in the evaluation of non-commissioned officers (NCOs) within the U.S. Army. However, several other forms and documents often accompany it to provide additional context or fulfill related requirements. Understanding these forms can help ensure a smoother evaluation process and compliance with Army regulations.

• DA Form 4856: This is the Developmental Counseling Form. It is used to document counseling sessions between leaders and soldiers. The form captures the discussion points, goals, and action plans, helping to track an NCO's development over time.
• DA Form 67-9: This is the NCO Evaluation Report. It serves a similar purpose to the DA Form 2166-9-1 but is used for different ranks and evaluation periods. This form provides a comprehensive overview of an NCO's performance and potential.
• DA Form 1059: This form is the Academic Evaluation Report. It is utilized to evaluate a soldier's performance in formal military schools. It provides insights into the soldier's learning and accomplishments during their training.
• DA Form 7500: This is the Army Command Policy for NCOs. It outlines the responsibilities and expectations for NCOs within the Army, providing a framework for evaluation and professional development.
• AR 623-3: This Army Regulation governs the evaluation process for soldiers. It provides guidelines on how evaluations should be conducted, including the roles of raters and senior raters, ensuring consistency and fairness in the evaluation process.

These forms and documents, when used in conjunction with the DA Form 2166-9-1, create a comprehensive framework for evaluating NCOs. They not only help in assessing performance but also in fostering growth and development within the ranks. Understanding and utilizing these documents effectively can lead to better outcomes for both NCOs and their leaders.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, there are several key points to keep in mind to ensure accuracy and compliance with Army regulations.

• Administrative Data: Ensure that all personal information, such as name, SSN, and rank, is filled out correctly in Part I. This data is essential for proper identification.
• Reason for Submission: Clearly state the reason for submitting the evaluation report. This could include annual evaluations or special circumstances.
• Rater and Senior Rater Information: Provide accurate details for both the rater and senior rater, including their names, ranks, and signatures. This verifies that the evaluation has been reviewed.
• Duty Description: In Part III, describe the rated NCO's principal duties and responsibilities. Be specific about daily tasks and any special emphasis areas.
• Performance Evaluation: In Part IV, assess the NCO's performance across various attributes, such as character, presence, and intellect. Use clear, concise comments to support your ratings.
• APFT Information: Include the results of the Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). If the NCO fails or has a profile, provide necessary comments explaining the situation.
• Signature Acknowledgment: The rated NCO must sign the form to acknowledge that they have seen the completed report, even if they do not agree with it.
• Counseling Dates: Document counseling dates accurately. This shows that the rated NCO has received feedback throughout the evaluation period.
• Overall Potential Assessment: The senior rater must assess the NCO's potential compared to others in the same grade. This assessment is crucial for future assignments.
• Broadening Assignments: List any broadening assignments that could enhance the NCO's career development. This demonstrates a commitment to professional growth.

By following these guidelines, the completion of the DA 2166-9-1 form can be streamlined, leading to a more effective evaluation process.

The DA Form 2166-9-1 is similar to the DA Form 2166-9, which serves as the NCO Evaluation Report for different ranks. Both forms assess the performance and potential of Non-Commissioned Officers (NCOs) within the Army. While the DA Form 2166-9 is designed for higher-ranking NCOs, the 2166-9-1 specifically targets Sergeants. Each form includes sections for administrative data, performance evaluations, and recommendations for future assignments, ensuring a comprehensive review of the NCO's capabilities and achievements.

Another document comparable to the DA Form 2166-9-1 is the DA Form 1059, which is used for the Academic Evaluation Report. This form evaluates soldiers who have completed training courses. Like the NCO Evaluation Report, the DA Form 1059 contains sections for administrative data and performance assessments. It highlights the soldier's academic performance and potential for further military education, emphasizing the importance of continued professional development within the Army.

The DA Form 4856, known as the Developmental Counseling Form, is also similar. This document is utilized for providing feedback and guidance to soldiers. It captures the soldier's strengths and areas for improvement, much like the evaluation forms. Both documents aim to enhance the soldier's performance and career trajectory, fostering open communication between the soldier and their leadership.

The Officer Evaluation Report (OER), specifically DA Form 67-10, shares similarities with the DA Form 2166-9-1 as well. The OER assesses the performance and potential of commissioned officers. Both forms contain sections for administrative data, performance evaluations, and recommendations. They serve to provide a structured framework for evaluating leadership qualities and competencies, ensuring that both officers and NCOs receive thorough assessments of their contributions to the Army.

Lastly, the DA Form 7000, known as the Request for Personnel Action, is comparable in that it addresses personnel evaluations and actions. This form is used to initiate changes in a soldier's status, such as promotions or reassignments. While it does not evaluate performance directly, it supports the overall personnel management process, similar to how the DA Form 2166-9-1 contributes to evaluating and documenting the performance of NCOs. Both documents play vital roles in maintaining accurate records and facilitating career progression within the Army.

When filling out the DA 2166-9-1 form, it is essential to follow certain guidelines to ensure accuracy and compliance. Below are eight key dos and don'ts to keep in mind:

• Do ensure all names are written in the correct format: Last, First, Middle Initial.
• Do double-check the Social Security Number (SSN) or DOD ID Number for accuracy.
• Do include all required dates in the specified format (YYYYMMDD).
• Do verify that the rated NCO's email address ends with .gov or .mil.
• Don't leave any fields blank; if a section is not applicable, indicate this clearly.
• Don't use abbreviations or acronyms that may not be universally understood.
• Don't forget to sign and date the form in the appropriate sections.
• Don't submit the form without reviewing it for spelling and grammatical errors.